Exploring the Differences Between International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court

Question	Answer
1. What is the primary purpose of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC)?	The ICJ primarily deals with disputes between countries, while the ICC focuses on prosecuting individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
2. What composition judges ICJ ICC?	The ICJ has 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and the Security Council, while the ICC has 18 judges elected by the Assembly of States Parties.
3. How cases brought ICJ ICC?	Cases before the ICJ must be submitted by states, while the ICC prosecutor can initiate investigations and bring cases against individuals.
4. What role United Nations ICJ ICC?	The ICJ is a principal organ of the UN and settles legal disputes submitted by states, while the ICC operates independently but has a cooperation agreement with the UN.
5. Can individuals be prosecuted by the ICJ?	No, the ICJ only has jurisdiction over states and cannot prosecute individuals.
6. What jurisdiction ICC?	The ICC has jurisdiction over individuals for the most serious crimes of international concern, regardless of the nationality of the accused or where the crime took place.
7. How decisions ICJ ICC enforced?	The ICJ decisions are binding and are enforced through diplomatic means, while the ICC relies on the cooperation of member states to enforce its decisions.
8. Are limitations cases ICJ ICC hear?	The ICJ can only hear cases between states that have consented to its jurisdiction, while the ICC can hear cases referred by states or initiated by the prosecutor.
9. What process appointing judges ICJ ICC?	Judges ICJ elected UN, while judges ICC elected Assembly States Parties list candidates nominated states.
10. Can decisions ICJ ICC appealed?	The ICJ does not have an appeal process, but its decisions can be reviewed and revised. The ICC has a separate Appeals Chamber that hears appeals against the decisions of the Trial Chamber.

Exploring the Difference between International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court

As a law enthusiast, the world of international justice never fails to fascinate me. I have always been curious about the key differences between the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC). Let`s delve into this intriguing subject and uncover the distinctions between these two influential institutions.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ)

The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). Its role is to settle legal disputes between states and give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by the UN. The court consists of 15 judges elected for nine-year terms by the UN General Assembly and the Security Council.

Established	Location	Jurisdiction
1945	The Hague, Netherlands	Disputes between states and advisory opinions

The ICJ operates on the basis of two main sources of law: international conventions and custom, as well as general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. It aims to promote the peaceful resolution of disputes and uphold the rule of law at the international level.

The International Criminal Court (ICC)

The ICC, on the other hand, is a permanent international court established to prosecute individuals for the most serious crimes of international concern, such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. It independent institution part UN system.

Established	Location	Jurisdiction
2002	The Hague, Netherlands	Individuals responsible for international crimes

The ICC has 123 member states and is governed by the Rome Statute, which outlines the court`s jurisdiction, structure, and functioning. It aims to hold individuals accountable for their actions and contribute to the prevention of future atrocities.

Key Differences

While both the ICJ and ICC are based in The Hague and play crucial roles in the field of international justice, there are several fundamental differences between the two institutions:

Aspect	International Court Justice	International Criminal Court
Establishment	Founded 1945	Established 2002
Jurisdiction	Settles disputes between states and gives advisory opinions	Prosecutes individuals for international crimes
Membership	UN member states	123 member states

Reflecting on the distinct roles and functions of the ICJ and ICC highlights the diverse efforts made to promote international justice and hold individuals and states accountable for their actions. The two institutions symbolize the global commitment to upholding the rule of law and seeking justice for victims of international crimes.

It is important for legal professionals and enthusiasts to understand the nuances of these institutions and their respective mandates, as they continue to shape the landscape of international law and justice.

As I continue to explore the captivating realm of international justice, I am inspired by the dedication and perseverance of those working within the ICJ and ICC to pursue justice and accountability on the global stage.

Contract: International Court of Justice vs International Criminal Court

Below is a legal contract outlining the differences between the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.

Article 1: Introduction
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) International Criminal Court (ICC) two distinct international judicial bodies separate mandates functions. This contract seeks to delineate the differences between these two institutions in accordance with international law and legal practice.
Article 2: Jurisdiction
The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and has jurisdiction to settle legal disputes between states. It jurisdiction individuals. Conversely, the ICC is a permanent international criminal court with jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for the most serious crimes under international law, such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
Article 3: Composition
The ICJ is composed of 15 judges elected by the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council, whereas the ICC is comprised of 18 judges who are elected by the Assembly of States Parties. The ICC also has a separate Office of the Prosecutor responsible for conducting investigations and prosecutions.
Article 4: Applicable Law
The ICJ applies international law as provided for in treaties, customary international law, and general principles of law. In contrast, the ICC applies the Rome Statute and other relevant international legal instruments in its prosecutions.
Article 5: Conclusion
In conclusion, it is imperative to recognize the distinctions between the ICJ and the ICC in their respective roles, functions, and jurisdictions. This contract serves as a legal document to delineate these differences and provide clarity on the distinct nature of these international judicial bodies.